Engagement Leadership · Control room
Stakeholder & Sponsor Alignment Cockpit
SIMULATEDVerified Jul 2, 2026A snapshot lies; a trajectory tells the truth. The grid places each stakeholder by power and interest, the sparklines show where sentiment is heading — and 3 are drifting, including the sponsor.
Power × interest
Dot color = current sentiment; rose outline = drifting. X = interest, Y = power.
Stakeholders · 6-week trajectory
Pre-steering briefing
Exec sponsor (CIO)NeutraldriftingWhy now
Two quiet weeks — no win shared since the pilot demo, and a peer flagged cost. Champion energy is cooling to neutral.
Who talks to them
You, in a 1:1 before the steering — not during it.
The message
Bring one concrete win (containment +5 pts) and the single decision you need; re-anchor the why.
By when
48 hours before the pre-read goes out.
3 stakeholders drifting
Steering-committee takeaway: Programs don't lose sponsors in meetings; they lose them in the silence between meetings.
Resume echo — multi-stakeholder consulting delivery (Deloitte/Verizon, Genpact/Morgan Stanley).
How this is built
Each stakeholder carries a power/interest coordinate (grid placement) and a six-week sentiment trajectory (Blocker→Champion). Drift = latest sentiment below the starting point; the briefing is authored per stakeholder around who, what, from whom, and by when.
Stack: Next.js (static) + shared design system; client-side.
Limitations: sentiment is a judgment read, not instrumented; archetypes are illustrative. It structures the alignment work between meetings, not a CRM.